The Relationship Between Energy Intensity and Sectoral Transformation in Türkiye: A Long-Run Analysis Based on the Services Sector Share

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19162738

Keywords:

Energy Economics, Energy Intensity, Türkiye, Structural Breaks, ARDL Bounds Test, Services Sector Share.

Abstract

This study investigates the long-run dynamics of energy intensity in Türkiye over the period 2000–2022, focusing on per capita income and the share of the services sector in total value added as a proxy for the sectoral composition of the economy. Energy intensity, defined as the amount of energy consumed per unit of economic output, is widely used as an indicator of energy efficiency and sustainable growth. Given that economies exposed to crises and macroeconomic shocks may not follow a single stable regime, the study tests for potential structural breaks in the energy intensity series. The Bai–Perron multiple structural break test identifies breakpoints in 2001, 2008, 2018, and 2020, corresponding to major macroeconomic disruptions including the post-2001 restructuring period, the global financial crisis, exchange rate shocks, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The stationarity properties of the variables are examined using the Zivot–Andrews unit root test. The results show that energy intensity and the services sector share are stationary at levels under structural breaks, whereas per capita income is not stationary in levels, making the ARDL bounds testing approach appropriate. The ARDL bounds test confirms a long-run cointegration relationship between energy intensity, per capita income, and the services sector share. Although the long-run coefficients carry the expected negative signs, they are not statistically significant. However, the error correction model indicates a strong adjustment toward long-run equilibrium, and CUSUM and CUSUMSQ tests confirm parameter stability. The findings suggest that energy efficiency policies should consider crisis episodes and cost shocks and be supported by efficiency-oriented structural transformation.

References

Bai, Jushan ve Pierre Perron. “Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models”. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18/1 (2003), 1–22.

Bai, Jushan ve Pierre Perron. “Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes”. Econometrica 66/1 (1998), 47–78.

Brown, Robert L., James Durbin ve John M. Evans. “Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 37/2 (1975), 149–163.

De Cian, Enrica, Michael Schymura, Elena Verdolini ve Sebastian Voigt. Energy Intensity Developments in 40 Major Economies: Structural Change or Technology Improvement? Mannheim: ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research, 2013.

Hoekstra, Rutger ve Jeroen C. J. M. van der Bergh. “Comparing Structural and Index Decomposition Analysis”. Energy Economics 25/1 (2003), 39–64.

International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA, 2023.

Mulder, Peter ve Henri L. F. de Groot. “Structural Change and Convergence of Energy Intensity across OECD Countries, 1970–2005”. Energy Economics 34/6 (2012), 1910–1921.

Pesaran, M. Hashem, Yongcheol Shin ve Richard J. Smith. “Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships”. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16/3 (2001), 289–326.

Sak, Ali Kursat ve Bülent Güloğlu. “Structural Change and Energy Productivity in Türkiye”. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 5/3 (2015), 701–714.

Schäfer, Andreas. “Structural Change in Energy Use”. Energy Policy 33/4 (2005), 429–437.

Steenhof, Paul A. “Decomposition of Electricity Demand in China’s Industrial Sector”. Energy Economics 28/3 (2006), 370–384.

Stern, David I. “Economic Growth and Energy”. Energy 25/4 (2004), 35–51.

T.C. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı. Türkiye National Energy Plan. Ankara: Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, 2022.

World Bank (WB). “Energy Intensity Level of Primary Energy (MJ/$2017 PPP GDP) (EG.EGY.PRIM.PP.KD)”. Erişim 14 Şubat 2026.

https://data.worldbank.org/

Yılmaz, Alper, Serap Ürüt Kelleci ve Aziz Bostan. “Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sektörel Enerji Tüketiminin Ayrıştırma Yöntemiyle Analizi”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 31/2 (2016), 1–27.

Zivot, Eric ve Donald W. K. Andrews. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis”. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10/3 (1992), 25–44.

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Taşcı, H. (2026). The Relationship Between Energy Intensity and Sectoral Transformation in Türkiye: A Long-Run Analysis Based on the Services Sector Share. International Journal of Dorlion Academic Social Research (IJODASOR), 4(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19162738

Issue

Section

Articles