Kant's Separatist Approach in Terms of the Relationship Between Religion and Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14536228Keywords:
Phylosophy of Religion, Kant, Logic, Religion, Science, Religion & Science Relationship, Seperationism, Independence.Abstract
The universe is covered with mysteries that lead to deep meaning and thought in a way that attracts the attention of the human mind. In all periods of the history of thought, there have been intellectual acts on being and existence. In this context, many great philosophers such as Leibniz drew attention to the astonishing state of existence by questioning how existence came into being. These inquiries have always stimulated inquisitive minds. While some say that there are no answers to such questions, others say that there are possible answers to these questions in the human search for meaning. In the ancient period, philosophers such as Aristotle began by pointing out that the desire to know is an important and indispensable element of human nature, while in the modern period, great phi-losophers such as Kant argued that the human mind is naturally inclined to produce metaphysical concepts. This situation has led the great minds of every period to ponder on the mystery of knowledge and existence, and when it comes to the meaning and essence of existence, we have arrived at the mutual relationship between religion and science, which are directly concerned with these issues. Because religion and science are undoubtedly the most important fields that claim to answer both the nature and the questions of existence. In this context, the views of the German philosopher Immauel Kant, who is one of the first names that come to mind in terms of his influence on the modern period and have inspired many philosophers, theologians and scientists to this day, are still very much alive today. The general and popular opinion is that Kant demolished metaphysics and argued that there is an irreconcilability between religion and science. However, his understanding of knowledge was based on building a new metaphysics rather than demolishing metaphysics. In this context, the meaning of religion and science in terms of his philosophy of knowledge constitutes the main subject of our study. In our study, we first examined Kant's understanding of knowledge based on his works. Then, by investigating what religious concepts such as God, morality and immortality, which are among the most fundamental issues of metaphysics, correspond to in his epistemology, we tried to justify the thesis that the “separationist/independence” model of religion and science is more appropriate to Kant's views on the relationship between religion and science, and we concluded that, contrary to popular belief, he rebuilt metaphysics, not destroyed it, and declared a separationist/independenceist view between religion and science, not a confrontational one.
References
Akdoğan, Hüseyin. “G. E. Lessing ve I. Kant’da Vahiy Kavramı ve Vahyin Pedagojik Değeri”. e-Şarkiyat İlmi Araştırmalar Dergisi 8/15 (2016), 357-372.
Albayrak, Mevlüt. “Skolastik Felsefede Tanrı’nın Varlığı ile İlgili Deliller ve Kant”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2 (1995), 277-298.
Arı, Yılmaz. “A Crime against Humanity and the Tragedy of Genocide: An Evaluation That Israel Should Be Sued for State Terrorism against Palestinians”. çev. Mustafa Turan. Uluslararası Dorlion Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (DASAD)1/2 (December 2023), 445-465. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10429568
Arı, Yılmaz. “Bir İnsanlık Suçu Ve Soykırım Trajedisi: İsrail’in Filistinlilere Uyguladığı Devlet Terörü Nedeniyle Yargılanması Gerektiğine Dair Bir Değerlendirme”. Darulhadis İslami Araştırmalar Dergisi 5 (Aralık 2023), 22-44.
https://doi.org/10.61216/darulhadisdergisi.1392165
Arı, Yılmaz. “Gölgede Kalan Yıkım: İsrail’in Devlet Destekli Terörü Ve Soykırım Trajedisi Tarihi”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11/2 (Eylül 2024), 639-665. https://doi.org/10.51702/esoguifd.1491769
Aristoteles. Metafizik. çev. Gurur Sev. İstanbul: Pinhan Yayıncılık, 2. Baskı, 2016.
Atayman, Veysel. Aklın Sınırları-Kant Felsefesine Giriş. İstanbul: Donkişot Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2005.
Barbour, Ian G. Bilim ve Din: Çatışma-Ayrışma-Uzlaşma. çev. Nebi Mehdiyev-Mübariz Camal. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2. Baskı, 2012.
Cassirer, Ernst. Kant’ın Yaşamı ve Öğretisi. çev. Doğan Özlem. İstanbul: İnkılâp Kitabevi, 2. Baskı, 1996.
Demirtaş, Mehmet. “Kant'ın ‘İnanca Yer Açmak İçin Bilgiyi İnkâr Ettim’ Sözünün İman ve Bilgi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/1 (2013), 289-303.
Dinçer, Esin Hamdi. “Kant Düşüncesinde Deneyimin Sürekliliği ve Aydınlanma”. Felsefelogos 20/62 (2016), 121-135.
Ewing, Alfred Cyril. “Kant's Attack on Metaphysics”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 8/30 (4) (1954), 371-391.
Guyer, Paul - Wood, Alan. Introducing Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundary of Pure Reason. Edinburgh: Thomas Allan & Co., 1838.
Kant, Immanuel. Arı Usun Eleştirisi. çev. Aziz Yardımlı. İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi, 1. Baskı, 1993.
Kant, Immanuel. Pratik Usun Eleştirisi. çev. İ. Zeki Eyuboğlu. Ankara: Say Yayınları, 5. Baskı, 2001.
Kant, Immanuel. Gelecekte Bilim Olarak Ortaya Çıkabilecek Her Metafiziğe Prolegomena. çev. İonna Kuçuradi – Yusuf Örnek. Ankara: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 3. Baskı, 2002.
Kant, Immanuel. The Conflict of the Faculties. çev. Mary J. Gregor. New York: Abaris Books, First Edition, 1979.
McGaughey, Douglas R. “Kant On Religion And Science: Independence or Integration?”. Zygon 41/3 (2006), 727-746.
Magee, Bryan. Büyük Filozoflar. çev. Ahmet Cevizci. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2001.
Önal, Mehmet – Saygın, Tuncay. “Kant’ın Yetiştiği Dini Atmosfer ve Tanrı İnancı”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 2/1 (Bahar 2011), 105-126.
Özalp, Hasan. Batı Düşüncesinde Tanrı ve Tasarım –Bilimsel Felsefi ve Teolojik Bir Yaklaşım. Ankara: Otto Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2015.
Reçber, Mehmet Sait. Tanrı’yı Bilmenin İmkân ve Mahiyeti. Ankara: Kitabiyat Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2004.
Russell, Bertrand. Batı Felsefesi Tarihi. Çev. Muammer Sencer. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 1973, 1-3.
Tan, Necmettin. “Kant'ın Din Anlayışı”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 51/2 (2010), 315-330.
Yavuz, Zikri. “Din ve Bilim İlişkisi”. Din Felsefesi El Kitabı. ed. Recep Kılıç ve Mehmet Sait Reçber. ss. 367-384. Ankara: Grafiker Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2014.
Yıldırım, Ali. “Ödev Etiğinin Dini Etik Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Özel Sayı (2019), 508-519.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Melih Taştan, Ayşe Orhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.