Perceived Cultural Functions of a TIKA-Funded University Radio in Northern Afghanistan: Implications for Turkish Soft Power and Cultural Convergence

Main Article Content

Sakhidad Mahdiyar
Göktürk Yıldız
Muhammad Akram Hakim

Özet

This paper explores audience reactions to the cultural role of a donor-operated university radio station in a post-conflict situation in northern Afghanistan. The study seeks to determine the radio station's cultural-sensitivity effects on the audience's attitudes toward the donor country and, unlike the majority of studies of media-focused development aid, does not assume positive effects. This study employed a cross-sectional survey (N = 422) using correlation and regression analyses, showing a moderate positive association (r = .482, p < .001; R² = .232) between perceptions of the radio’s cultural functions and favorable attitudes toward TIKA/Türkiye. This association does not imply causation. However, perceptions remain primarily attitudinal, and the cross-sectional design, combined with socio-political constraints that restricted participation to men, limits generalizability and precludes causal inference or inclusion of female perspectives. The findings indicate that in northern Afghanistan, soft power emerges as a fluid, contested perception shaped by cultural proximity and local context, rather than solely by development aid. Limitations include the cross-sectional design and male-dominated sample due to socio-political constraints.

Article Details

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Mahdiyar, S., Yıldız, G., & Hakim, M. A. (2026). Perceived Cultural Functions of a TIKA-Funded University Radio in Northern Afghanistan: Implications for Turkish Soft Power and Cultural Convergence . Uluslararası Dorlion Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (DASAD), 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20721268
Bölüm
Makaleler

Referanslar

Akseer, Tabasum et al. Afghanistan in 2019: A Survey of the Afghan People. ed. Tabasum Akseer - John Rieger. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation, 2019. Accessed 15 April 2026. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Afghanistan_2019-Survey-of-the-Afghan-People.pdf#page=3.10

Altunişik, Meliha Benli. “Türkiye’s Changing Middle East Policy.” UNISCI Discussion Papers 23 (2010), 149–162. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/767/76715004009.pdf

Baran. “A Radio Station Started Operating in Jawzjan.” Pajhwok Afghan News, 2022. Accessed December 11, 2026. https://pajhwok.com/fa/2022/04/05/a-radio-station-started-operating-in-jawzjan/

Blechman, Barry M. “Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 119/4 (December 22, 2004), 680–682.

Castells, Manuel. Communication Power. New York: Oxford University Press Inc, 1st Ed., 2009.

Cochran, William G. Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 3rd Ed., 1991.

Couldry, Nick - Hepp, Andreas. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1st Ed., 2017.

Cowan, Geoffrey - Arsenault, Amelia. “Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616/1 (March 2008), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311863

Creswell, John W. - Creswell, J. David. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication, 5th Ed., 2018.

Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Strategic Depth: Türkiye’s International Position. Küre Publications, 1st Ed., 2001.

Fidan, Hakan - Nurdun, Rahman. “Türkiye’s Role in the Global Development Assistance Community: The Case of TIKA (Turkish International Cooperation and Development Agency).” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 10/1 (April 2008), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190801895888

Greenwood, Davydd J. “Theoretical Research, Applied Research, and Action Research.” Engaging Contradictions: Theory, Politics, and Methods of Activist Scholarship. ed. Charles R. Hale. 319–340. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2008.

Habermas, Jurgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT press, 1991.

Hjarvard, Stig. “The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change.” Nordicom Review 29/2 (2008), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181

Kalın, İbrahim. “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Türkiye.” PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16/3 (October 1, 2011), 5–23.

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/perception/issue/48986/625023

Kearn, David W. “The Hard Truths about Soft Power.” Journal of Political Power 4/1 (2011), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.556869

Lerner, Daniel. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press, 1964.

Manyozo, Linje. Media, Communication and Development. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, 1st Ed., 2012.

Melissen, Jan. “The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice.” The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. ed. Jan Melissen. 3–27. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. Workbook for Neumann Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 7th Ed., 2014.

Nunnally, Jum C. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2nd Ed., 1978.

Nye, Joseph S. “Soft Power.” Foreign Policy 80 (1990), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580

Oǧuzlu, Tarik. “Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 61/1 (March 2007), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357710601142518

Pierce, Jon L et al. “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research.” Review of General Psychology 7/1 (2003), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

Servaes, Jan. “Communication for Development and Social Change.” The Routledge Handbook of Nonprofit Communication. ed. Gisela Gonçalves - Evandro Oliveira. 23–31. New York: Routledge, 1st Ed., 2022.

Skuse, Andrew. “Radio, Politics and Trust In Afghanistan: A Social History of Broadcasting.” Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies 64/3 (2002), 267–279.

Straubhaar, Joseph D. “Beyond Media Imperialism: Assymetrical Interdependence and Cultural Proximity.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 8/1 (March 1991), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039109366779

The Investment and Finance Office of the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye. “Türkiye Ascends 10 Places in Global Soft Power Index 2024.” 2024. Accessed April 2, 2026. https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/news/news-from-Türkiye/pages/turkiye-ascends-10-places-in-global-soft-power-index-2024.aspx

Tichenor, P. J. et al. “Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge.” Public Opinion Quarterly 34/2 (January 1, 1970), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1086/267786

Zaharna, R. S. Battles to Bridges: US Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy after 9/11. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1st Ed., 2010.

Zahran, Geraldo - Ramos, Leonardo. “From Hegemony to Soft Power: Implications of a Conceptual Change.” Soft Power and US Foreign Policy. ed. Inderjeet Parmar - Michael Cox. 12–31. London: Routledge, 1st Ed., 2010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856499

Zöllner, Oliver. “German Public Diplomacy: The Dialogue of Cultures.” Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. ed. Nancy Snow - Nicholas John Cull. 254–263. New York: Routledge, 1st Ed., 2020.